 |
|
|
 |
|
Rationale:
- The patient has undergone an experience in which her right to grant or deny consent was taken from her, and obtaining consent
for medical treatment and for the gathering of evidence has important psychological and legal implications.
- In some jurisdictions, the law mandates that patients be informed of their right to have a family member, friend, or patient
advocate in the room during all parts of the examination.
|
|
Evidence:
- California Penal Code requires examiners to offer that an advocate or companion may remain with a patient during examination
(20).
- In a representative sample survey of Chicago area therapists, most believed that some professionals engage in harmful behaviors
(i.e., implying a patient was “asking for it”) that are detrimental to rape survivors' psychological well-being (21).
- One study used posted flyer recruitment to study 102 Chicago area female survivors of nonstranger rape. Those who received
minimal assistance from either the legal or medical system and encountered victim-blaming behaviors from system personnel
reported significantly elevated levels of posttraumatic stress symptoms (22).
|
|
Comments:
|
| FAQs |
|
|
|
Carolyn J. Sachs, MD, MPH has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations.
Steven E. Weinberger, MD, FACP, Acting Editor, PIER, has stock holdings in Glaxosmithkline and Abbott.
|
|
|
|
The information included herein should never be used as a substitute
for clinical judgment and does not represent an official position of
ACP. Because all PIER modules are updated regularly, printed web pages
or PDFs may rapidly become obsolete. Therefore, PIER users should
compare the date of the last update on the website with any printout
to ensure that the information being referred to is the most current
available.
|
PIER is copyrighted (c) 2009 by the American College of Physicians,
190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572, USA.
|
|
|