 |
|
|
 |
|
Rationale:
- The patient needs to know that officer collection of a history and evidence does not always lead to an arrest or legal actions
against a suspect.
- During the immediate postassault period patients may not be able to absorb all the legal information provided; it is critical
that they have a knowledgeable advocate or a sensitive law enforcement contact for legal follow-up information.
- Reporting an assault to law enforcement and obtaining an order of protection may decrease the risk of repeated sexual assault
by an intimate partner.
|
|
Evidence:
- Mainly consensus.
- In a case series of 888 female sexual assault patients, prosecutors filed charges in only 15%. Characteristics positively
associated with filing charges included examination within 24 hours after assault, partner or spouse as an assailant, oral
assault, and anogenital trauma (88).
- One nonrandomized study of 148 female victims of intimate partner sexual assault found a 59% and 70% decrease in repeated
sexual assault when the women reported the first assault to police and applied for a protective order (15).
|
|
Comments:
- Follow-up legal processes, including the statute of limitations for filing of charges, vary tremendously by state law and
local protocol. Practitioners must be familiar with local policies or refer patients to appropriate sources to obtain such
information.
- Typically, an on-duty officer will respond to the medical setting when called about a sexual assault. The officer will take
the history from the patient and the evidence collected by the examiner. The officer will then turn over the case to a detective
to complete the investigation. If there is sufficient evidence, the case is submitted to the prosecutor and the suspect is
arrested. Prosecutors review cases to determine whether charges can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. If so, a case will
be filed; if not, the case is returned to the original police agency for more evidence or is rejected.
|
| FAQs |
|
|
|
Carolyn J. Sachs, MD, MPH has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations.
Darren B. Taichman, MD, PhD, Editor, PIER, has received grant support from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd , and honoraria for
continuing medical education grand rounds and lectures given.
|
|
|
|
The information included herein should never be used as a substitute
for clinical judgment and does not represent an official position of
ACP. Because all PIER modules are updated regularly, printed web pages
or PDFs may rapidly become obsolete. Therefore, PIER users should
compare the date of the last update on the website with any printout
to ensure that the information being referred to is the most current
available.
|
PIER is copyrighted (c) 2010 by the American College of Physicians,
190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572, USA.
|
|
|