Home | Structured Search | Drug Resource
Find: within
Malaria > Follow-up Author: Rick M. Fairhurst, MD, PhD; Thomas E. Wellems, MD, PhD
Module updated - 2009-11-19
Author information and module status
Prevention
Screening
Diagnosis
Consultation for Diagnosis
Hospitalization
Non-drug Therapy
Drug Therapy
Patient Education
Consultation for Management
Follow-up

Tables
Figures
References
Glossary
What's New
Patient Information
Additional Resources
Tools

Rationale:

  • Once malaria symptoms resolve and a negative blood smear is documented during initial therapy, routine parasitologic monitoring is not indicated.
  • Patients who are inadequately treated due to noncompliance or parasite drug resistance are at risk for recrudescence from surviving blood parasites.
  • Although the time to recrudescence will depend on a number of factors (drug pharmacokinetics, malaria immune status), most will occur within the first 28 days from the start of antimalarial treatment with some occurring as late as 10 weeks.
  • Malaria recrudescence will be accompanied by a return of symptoms compelling patients to seek medical attention (“clinical failure”).

Evidence:

  • Drugs that are eliminated slowly, such as mefloquine, may suppress recrudescence of drug-resistant parasites up to 10 weeks after treatment. One prospective randomized trial compared the treatment efficacy of standard- and high-dose mefloquine for P. falciparum malaria on the Thai-Cambodian border, an area with mefloquine-resistant malaria. Treatment failure, defined by recrudescence of parasites, occurred in 7% (days 7 to 9), 40% (day 28) and 50% (day 42) of 71 patients (153).

Comments:

  • Recurrent parasitemia (“parasitologic failure”) occasionally may not be accompanied by recurrent symptoms in patients with immunity from long-term residence in an endemic area. These patients will not seek medical attention and will likely clear their parasitemia on their own without further drug treatment.
  • World Health Organization definitions of treatment failure are most useful in monitoring drug resistance in the research setting. They have recently been summarized in a review article (154).

FAQs
Harry Tagbor, MBChB, DrPH, editorial consultant, has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations. Rick M. Fairhurst, MD, PhD has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations. Thomas E. Wellems, MD, PhD has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations.
Steven E. Weinberger, MD, FACP, Acting Editor, PIER, has stock holdings in Glaxosmithkline and Abbott.


The information included herein should never be used as a substitute for clinical judgment and does not represent an official position of ACP. Because all PIER modules are updated regularly, printed web pages or PDFs may rapidly become obsolete. Therefore, PIER users should compare the date of the last update on the website with any printout to ensure that the information being referred to is the most current available.
PIER is copyrighted (c) 2009 by the American College of Physicians,
190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572, USA.