 |
|
|
 |
|
Rationale:
- Prophylactic regimens change frequently because of regional variability in malaria risk (even within countries), resurgence
of malaria in areas previously free of the disease, and the ongoing spread of drug-resistant parasites.
- Efficacy of malaria prophylaxis depends on the response of local parasite strains to antimalarial drugs and patient compliance.
|
|
Evidence:
- The risk of acquiring malaria varies according to: geographic region visited, travel destination within geographic areas (e.g.,
urban vs. rural), type of accommodations (e.g., camping vs. air-conditioned hotel), duration of stay (e.g., <1-week business
trip vs. 3-month adventure travel), time of travel (high- vs. low-transmission season), altitude (<2,000 vs. >2,000 meters),
and efficacy of and adherence to malaria prophylaxis (1). Another risk factor is poor knowledge and understanding of the extent and potential severity of malaria.
- Chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum is widespread in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and South America (2). Chloroquine resistance has also been reported in some areas of the Middle East: Iran, Yemen, Oman, and Saudi Arabia (3).
- Chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum malaria has not been reported from Mexico, Central America north of the Panama Canal, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic.
- Mefloquine-resistant P. falciparum now occurs in Thailand, Cambodia, Myanmar, and Vietnam (4) with scattered cases reported in the Amazon Basin (5).
- High-grade resistance of P. vivax to chloroquine has been reported in Oceania and parts of Southeast Asia (6; 7). Case reports of patients with chloroquine-resistant P. vivax have also been reported from Brazil (8), Guyana (9), Colombia (10), India (11), and Myanmar (12).
- Chloroquine-resistant P. malariae has been reported in Sumatra, Indonesia (13).
|
|
Comments:
- Up-to-date maps and information identifying malarious areas within countries can be found in the Traveler's Health section of the CDC Web site.
- When in doubt, contact the CDC Malaria Hotline (770-488-7788) for the geographical distribution of drug-resistant malaria
and appropriate prophylactic regimens.
- Immigrants returning home to visit relatives are at high risk for acquiring malaria, because they often do not take malaria
prophylaxis (they are going home and do not consider malaria a serious disease); they are often medically underserved and
therefore less likely to seek pretravel advice; they often travel with children or when pregnant (e.g., returning to show
family a new child or because they are pregnant); and they do not know that they have lost immunity to malaria and are at
risk (14).
|
| FAQs |
|
|
|
Harry Tagbor, MBChB, DrPH, editorial consultant, has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations.
Rick M. Fairhurst, MD, PhD has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations.
Thomas E. Wellems, MD, PhD has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations.
Steven E. Weinberger, MD, FACP, Acting Editor, PIER, has stock holdings in Glaxosmithkline and Abbott.
|
|
|
|
The information included herein should never be used as a substitute
for clinical judgment and does not represent an official position of
ACP. Because all PIER modules are updated regularly, printed web pages
or PDFs may rapidly become obsolete. Therefore, PIER users should
compare the date of the last update on the website with any printout
to ensure that the information being referred to is the most current
available.
|
PIER is copyrighted (c) 2009 by the American College of Physicians,
190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572, USA.
|
|
|