Home | Structured Search | Drug Resource
Find: within
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder > Drug Therapy Author: Jeffrey P. Staab, MD, MS
Editorial changes - 2011-09-06
Author information and module status
Prevention
Screening
Diagnosis
Consultation for Diagnosis
Hospitalization
Non-drug Therapy
Drug Therapy
Patient Education
Consultation for Management
Follow-up

Tables
References
Glossary
What's New
Patient Information
Additional Resources
Tools

Rationale:

  • SSRIs do not benefit all patients with PTSD; some do better with more sedating medications, and they may need doses at the higher end of the safe-dose range.

Evidence:

  • The alternatives with the best evidence to support their use are mirtazapine and venlafaxine (35; 36; 37; 38; 39).
  • No substantive data support the use of buspirone, and no data are available on strategies for adding or substituting medications (26; 28; 40; 41; 42).
  • Prazosin has been associated with reductions in nightmares and global PTSD severity in both open and placebo-controlled trials (43; 44; 45; 46), and should be considered as adjunctive therapy in patients for whom nightmares are prominent.
  • A systematic review of evidence supporting pharmacologic intervention in patients who fail to respond to or do not tolerate SSRIs found that risperidone had the best evidence to favor its use in an adjunctive role (24).

Comments:

  • Some evidence exists to support secondary consideration of sedating TCAs and the monoamine oxidase inhibitor phenelzine for PTSD, but the greater propensity of these medications for significant adverse effects makes them less desirable alternatives.
  • The insomnia of chronic PTSD can be resistant to medication. Older antipsychiatric agents are not recommended and data are limited regarding newer ones such as risperidone and olanzapine.

FAQs
Jeffrey P. Staab, MD, MS, is a consultant for Eli Lilly, Forest Laboratories, received honorarium from Abbott Laboratories, received grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer. Michael Roy, MD, editorial consultant, received honorarium from PFizer.
Deborah Korenstein, MD, FACP, Co-Editor, PIER, has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations. Richard B. Lynn, MD, FACP, Co-Editor, PIER, has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations.


The information included herein should never be used as a substitute for clinical judgment and does not represent an official position of ACP. Because all PIER modules are updated regularly, printed web pages or PDFs may rapidly become obsolete. Therefore, PIER users should compare the date of the last update on the website with any printout to ensure that the information being referred to is the most current available.
PIER is copyrighted © 2012 by the American College of Physicians,
190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572, USA.