 |
|
|
 |
|
Rationale:
- Treating dyslipidemia aggressively decreases the risk of macrovascular disease. Although no large trials of patients exclusively
with type 1 diabetes have been done, subgroup analysis from large clinical trials has found that the use of HMG CoA-reductase
inhibitors is effective for the primary and secondary prevention of acute MI.
|
|
Evidence:
- In the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study, a subgroup of diabetes patients with average total and LDL
cholesterol levels were randomized to receive lovastatin (20 to 40 mg/d) or placebo in addition to a low-saturated fat, low-cholesterol
diet. After an average follow-up of 5.2 years, lovastatin reduced the incidence of first acute major coronary events, MI,
unstable angina, coronary revascularization procedures, and cardiovascular events (108).
- In the Heart Protection Study, patients with diabetes randomized to simvastatin had a 22% reduction in cardiovascular events.
This reduction was independent of baseline cholesterol levels and was also observed in patients with baseline LDL cholesterol
<116 mg/dL (109).
- The Helsinki Heart Study showed that compared with similarly dyslipidemic nondiabetic subjects, patients with type 2 diabetes
have a markedly increased risk for CAD. This elevated risk can be somewhat reduced by gemfibrozil. Of the 4081 participants
in this trial, 135 had type 2 diabetes at entry. Compared with nondiabetic subjects, patients with type 2 diabetes had lower
HDL cholesterol levels, higher triglyceride concentrations, greater BMI, and more hypertension (110; 111).
- A post hoc analysis was done on data from 202 diabetic patients and 4242 nondiabetic patients who participated in the Scandinavian
Simvastatin Survival Study (4S), in which participants were randomly assigned to placebo or to double-blind treatment with
simvastatin, 20 mg/d, and blinded dosage titration up to 40 mg/d. This analysis showed that over the 5.4-year median follow-up
period, simvastatin treatment improved the prognosis of diabetic patients with CAD. The absolute clinical benefit achieved
by cholesterol lowering may be greater in diabetic than in nondiabetic patients with CAD because diabetic patients have a
higher absolute risk of recurrent CAD events and other atherosclerotic events (112).
- The Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial, a 5-year trial that compared the effect of pravastatin and placebo, included
586 patients (14.1%) with clinical diagnoses of diabetes. The study showed that patients with diabetes are at high risk for
recurrent coronary events that can be reduced substantially by pravastatin treatment. Pravastatin treatment reduced the AR
for coronary events for diabetes patients by 8.1% and the RR by 25% (P = 0.05). Pravastatin also reduced the relative risk for revascularization procedures by 32% (P = 0.04) in the diabetes patients (113; 114).
|
|
Comments:
|
| FAQs |
|
|
|
Abd A. Tahrani, MD, MRCP, editorial consultant, received a grant from the UK Novo Nordisk Research Foundation. Maureen D. Passaro, MD has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations.
Robert E. Ratner, MD, is a consultant for Amylin Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Lifescan, Inc., NovoNordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda,
owns stocks in Merck, Johnson & Johnson, Abbott, received grants from Amylin, AstraZeneca, Bayhill Therapeutics, Boehringer
Ingelheim, Conjuchem, Inc., Eil Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, NovoNordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda. Deborah Korenstein, MD, FACP, Co-Editor, PIER, has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device
manufacturers, or health-care related organizations. Richard B. Lynn, MD, FACP, Co-Editor, PIER, has no financial relationships
with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations.
|
|
|
|
The information included herein should never be used as a substitute
for clinical judgment and does not represent an official position of
ACP. Because all PIER modules are updated regularly, printed web pages
or PDFs may rapidly become obsolete. Therefore, PIER users should
compare the date of the last update on the website with any printout
to ensure that the information being referred to is the most current
available.
|
PIER is copyrighted © 2012 by the American College of Physicians,
190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572, USA.
|
|
|