Home | Structured Search | Drug Resource
Find: within
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 > Drug Therapy Author: Maureen D. Passaro, MD; Robert E. Ratner, MD
Editorial changes - 2012-02-07
Author information and module status
Prevention
Screening
Diagnosis
Consultation for Diagnosis
Hospitalization
Non-drug Therapy
Drug Therapy
Patient Education
Consultation for Management
Follow-up

Tables
Figures
References
Glossary
What's New
Patient Information
Additional Resources
Tools

Quality Measures Quality Measures

Rationale:

  • Treating dyslipidemia aggressively decreases the risk of macrovascular disease. Although no large trials of patients exclusively with type 1 diabetes have been done, subgroup analysis from large clinical trials has found that the use of HMG CoA-reductase inhibitors is effective for the primary and secondary prevention of acute MI.

Evidence:

  • In the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study, a subgroup of diabetes patients with average total and LDL cholesterol levels were randomized to receive lovastatin (20 to 40 mg/d) or placebo in addition to a low-saturated fat, low-cholesterol diet. After an average follow-up of 5.2 years, lovastatin reduced the incidence of first acute major coronary events, MI, unstable angina, coronary revascularization procedures, and cardiovascular events (108).
  • In the Heart Protection Study, patients with diabetes randomized to simvastatin had a 22% reduction in cardiovascular events. This reduction was independent of baseline cholesterol levels and was also observed in patients with baseline LDL cholesterol <116 mg/dL (109).
  • The Helsinki Heart Study showed that compared with similarly dyslipidemic nondiabetic subjects, patients with type 2 diabetes have a markedly increased risk for CAD. This elevated risk can be somewhat reduced by gemfibrozil. Of the 4081 participants in this trial, 135 had type 2 diabetes at entry. Compared with nondiabetic subjects, patients with type 2 diabetes had lower HDL cholesterol levels, higher triglyceride concentrations, greater BMI, and more hypertension (110; 111).
  • A post hoc analysis was done on data from 202 diabetic patients and 4242 nondiabetic patients who participated in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S), in which participants were randomly assigned to placebo or to double-blind treatment with simvastatin, 20 mg/d, and blinded dosage titration up to 40 mg/d. This analysis showed that over the 5.4-year median follow-up period, simvastatin treatment improved the prognosis of diabetic patients with CAD. The absolute clinical benefit achieved by cholesterol lowering may be greater in diabetic than in nondiabetic patients with CAD because diabetic patients have a higher absolute risk of recurrent CAD events and other atherosclerotic events (112).
  • The Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial, a 5-year trial that compared the effect of pravastatin and placebo, included 586 patients (14.1%) with clinical diagnoses of diabetes. The study showed that patients with diabetes are at high risk for recurrent coronary events that can be reduced substantially by pravastatin treatment. Pravastatin treatment reduced the AR for coronary events for diabetes patients by 8.1% and the RR by 25% (P = 0.05). Pravastatin also reduced the relative risk for revascularization procedures by 32% (P = 0.04) in the diabetes patients (113; 114).

Comments:

  • None.

FAQs
Abd A. Tahrani, MD, MRCP, editorial consultant, received a grant from the UK Novo Nordisk Research Foundation. Maureen D. Passaro, MD has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations. Robert E. Ratner, MD, is a consultant for Amylin Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Lifescan, Inc., NovoNordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda, owns stocks in Merck, Johnson & Johnson, Abbott, received grants from Amylin, AstraZeneca, Bayhill Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Conjuchem, Inc., Eil Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, NovoNordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda.
Deborah Korenstein, MD, FACP, Co-Editor, PIER, has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations. Richard B. Lynn, MD, FACP, Co-Editor, PIER, has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations.


The information included herein should never be used as a substitute for clinical judgment and does not represent an official position of ACP. Because all PIER modules are updated regularly, printed web pages or PDFs may rapidly become obsolete. Therefore, PIER users should compare the date of the last update on the website with any printout to ensure that the information being referred to is the most current available.
PIER is copyrighted © 2012 by the American College of Physicians,
190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572, USA.