Smoking Cessation > Timeline Author: Kumanan Wilson, MD
Editorial changes - 2009-11-18
Author information and module status
Key Points
Population at Risk
Effectiveness/Harms of Counseling or Intervention on Changing Behavior
Effectiveness/Harms of Behavior Change on Clinical Outcomes
Direct Effectiveness of Intervention/Counseling on Clinical Outcomes
Timeline
Cost-Effectiveness
Patient Education
Referral/Consultation
Guidelines

Tables
References
What's New
Patient Information
Additional Resources
Tools

Quality Measures Quality Measures
Recommendation
Assess the smoking status in all patients routinely, and encourage each, from adolescents to patients over age 65, to quit smoking.A

Evidence:

  • A meta-analysis of nine studies found that clinicians who inquired about smoking status were approximately three times more likely (OR, 3.1 [CI, 2.2 to 4.2]) to introduce a smoking cessation intervention (1).
  • The 1994 U.S. Surgeon General report “Preventing tobacco use among young people,” reported that 71% of adults who had ever smoked daily were daily users at or before age 18 (74).
  • In a cohort study of 7178 healthy elderly men and women of age 65 years or more, persons who continued to smoke had higher rates of mortality as well as cardiovascular and neoplastic disease than former smokers or nonsmokers after 5 years follow-up. The RR of death was 2.1 for men and 1.8 for women among current smokers vs. nonsmokers, whereas the RR of death was 1.5 for men and 1.1 for women among former smokers vs. nonsmokers (6).

Comments:

  • None.

FAQs
Edward Ellerbeck, MD, MPH, editorial consultant, has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations. Kumanan Wilson, MD has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations.
Steven E. Weinberger, MD, FACP, Acting Editor, PIER, has stock holdings in Glaxosmithkline and Abbott.


The information included herein should never be used as a substitute for clinical judgment and does not represent an official position of ACP. Because all PIER modules are updated regularly, printed web pages or PDFs may rapidly become obsolete. Therefore, PIER users should compare the date of the last update on the website with any printout to ensure that the information being referred to is the most current available.
PIER is copyrighted (c) 2009 by the American College of Physicians,
190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572, USA.