Screening for Type 2 Diabetes > Effectiveness/Harms of Early Treatment Author: Lorraine Lipscombe, MD, FRCPC; Denice S. Feig, MD, MSc, FRCPC
Editorial changes - 2010-01-07
Author information and module status
Key Points
Population at Risk
Effectiveness/Harms of Screening Tests
Effectiveness/Harms of Early Treatment
Direct Evidence that Screening Reduces Adverse Outcomes
Timeline
Cost-Effectiveness
Patient Education
Referral/Consultation
Guidelines

Tables
References
Glossary
What's New
Patient Information
Additional Resources
Tools
Recommendation
Appreciate that tight BP control in patients with diabetes is associated with reductions in cardiovascular outcomes and deaths and that optimal BP targets differ depending on diabetes status.A

Evidence:

  • The HOT trial found that persons with diabetes randomly assigned to a target diastolic BP of 80 mm Hg had a 51% reduction in cardiovascular events (NNT, 8) and a 67% reduction in cardiovascular death (NNT, 14) after 5 years when compared with those assigned to a target of 90 mm Hg. Interestingly, lowering the diastolic BP target from 90 mm Hg to 80 mm Hg was not found to be beneficial in subjects without diabetes (89).
  • In the UKPDS, newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension randomly assigned to tight BP control (<=150/85 mm Hg) for 10 years had a significant reduction in diabetes-related deaths (RR, 0.68 [CI, 0.49 to 0.94]), as well as a reduction in stroke (RR, 0.56 [CI, 0.35 to 0.89]), any diabetes-related endpoint (RR, 0.76 [CI 0.62 to 0.92], and risk of microvascular complications. The NNT to prevent any diabetes complication was 6.1 (2.6 to 9.5), and to prevent a diabetes-related death, 15.0 (12.1 to 17.9) (90).
  • Two other small randomized controlled trials have shown significant reductions in all-cause mortality (91) and in strokes (92) in patients with diabetes given intensive BP therapy.

Comments:

  • All of these studies were conducted predominantly in persons with clinically diagnosed diabetes rather than through screening.

FAQs
Denice S. Feig, MD, MSc, FRCPC has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations. Lorraine Lipscombe, MD, FRCPC has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations. Sonal Singh, MD, editorial consultant, has no financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or health-care related organizations.
Darren B. Taichman, MD, PhD, Editor, PIER, has received grant support from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd , and honoraria for continuing medical education grand rounds and lectures given.


The information included herein should never be used as a substitute for clinical judgment and does not represent an official position of ACP. Because all PIER modules are updated regularly, printed web pages or PDFs may rapidly become obsolete. Therefore, PIER users should compare the date of the last update on the website with any printout to ensure that the information being referred to is the most current available.
PIER is copyrighted (c) 2010 by the American College of Physicians,
190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572, USA.